Minor Ratings after Week 3

	MINOR		3
1	Midlothian 1		155
2	Waxahachie 1		154
3	Crowley		153
4	Burleson 1		153
5	Midlothian 3		132
6	Whitney		130
7	Burleson 2		121
8	Cleburne 2		120
9	Granbury 1		120
10	Waxahachie 2		113
11	Red Oak		112
12	Cleburne 1		100
12	Granbury 2		100
12	Midlothian 2		100

Bantam Ratings after Week 3

	BANTAM		3
1	Granbury 2		155
2	Burleson		152
3	Crowley		151
4	Cleburne		150
5	Red Oak		121
6	Midlothian 2		120
7	Midlothian 1		110
8	Granbury 1		100
8	Waxahachie		100
8	Whitney		100

Note on Ratings

Still no clear picture of what teams are better. Next week it will be a lot clearer but on week five we should have a much better idea. It has always puzzled me as to why the teams that won don't always get their scores in very quickly. When I played sports and we won I made a point to tell people how we did. Where's that enthusiasm? I'm no longer going to hold up the teams that get their scores in because a few teams have trouble. The teams that haven't turned them in will be down at the bottom. With this system, if you don't turn in your scores, you only get to see the other teams move up. How about some scores, folks?

Major Ratings after Week 2

	MAJOR		2
1	Burleson 1		121
2	Cleburne 2		120
2	Crowley		120
2	Whitney		120
5	Burleson 2		116
6	Waxahachie 2		115
7	Granbury 1		110
7	Midlothian 3		110
9	Midlothian 1		108
10	Cleburne 1		100
10	Granbury 2		100
10	Midlothian 2		100
10	Red Oak		100
10	Waxahachie 1		100

Minor Ratings after Week 2

	MINOR		2
1	Burleson 1		121
1	Midlothian 1		121
1	Waxahachie 1		121
4	Crowley		120
5	Burleson 2		110
5	Cleburne 2		110
5	Granbury 1		110
5	Midlothian 3		110
5	Waxahachie 2		110
5	Whitney		110
11	Cleburne 1		100
11	Granbury 2		100
11	Midlothian 2		100
11	Red Oak		100

Bantam Ratings after Week 2

	BANTAM		2
1	Granbury 2		121
2	Burleson		120
2	Cleburne		120
2	Crowley		120
5	Midlothian 2		110
5	Red Oak		110
7	Granbury 1		100
7	Midlothian 1		100
7	Waxahachie		100
7	Whitney		100

Notes on Ratings

There isn't much to see yet. All the teams that won have a 110, all the teams that lost have a 100, and all the teams that tied have a 105. That's not the normal way to treat a tie but on the first week there has to be a method to place tying teams above those who haven't won and below those who haven't lost. After the first week this won't be used. Next week each team will use their current ratings as their starting rating (instead of 100 if they are higher) and the first two games will be recalculated. That will tell a lot more about how good the teams are than this week's ratings. This method only tells a team's estimated strength by whom they beat and whom they lose to, not by the points they rack up.